InfaruV4:Independent Industry News

Independent Industry News - Nouvelles de l'industrie indépendante
Logo
Name	Independent Industry News - Nouvelles de l'industrie indépendante
Key People	De_Remuva
Founder	De_Remuva
Founded	Divesk, Faru
Type	Independent public corporation
Industry	Mass Media Radio Digital Media
Headquarters	Divesk, Faru
Products	Television Radio Digital Media Newspaper

Independent Industry News - Nouvelles de l'industrie indépendante [IIN-NII], also known as Independent Industry, is a Diveskee mass-media public corporation that publishes its own newspaper and broadcast. It is headquartered in Divesk and has services in English and French. It's owner, founder and primary writer is De_Remuva. It remains operational even after the mysterious spontaneous disappearance of De_Remuva on the 13th of September. It is not known who is currently editing or operating the company since the disappearance of Divesk.

Publications

Issue #	Date	Content	Notes
1	April 24, 2024	CHANGE IN COMPANY TOWN Yesterday, the 23rd of April, due to discontent with the low wages, the workers stormed headquarters of the Mineral Mining Company Town and declared the Miners' and Soldiers' Council of Divesk. The Company was reorganized into the Institutional Mining Company as a wing of this new town. The Council's members, which include the former MMCT Mayor De_Remuva and headed by Subc0mmandante, is largey [sic] made up of members of the Revolutionary League of Shop Stewards. This new Company and Town have already made public dealings with the Cossacks. A word from a councilmen state "we are not separatists, this is not an independence movement. We are simply taking the principles of the anti-imperial revolution to heart." [Photo of the event]	First issue
2	September 24, 2024	CHANGE IN POSITIONS Following a convocation of the Soldiers' and Miners' of Divesk's Delegated Popular Power Council, the title for the position responsible with overseeing administrative actions and activites [sic] of the Soldiers' and Miners' Council of Divesk [sic] has been changed from Mayor to Lord Lieutenant. This change was produced through consensus of the delegates and members of administration. "Mayor", says current Lord Lieutenant de Remuva, "is an archaic title linked to the previous regimes (referring to the Imperial the Company regime), the new title, constructed through discussion and consensus, plasis [sic] emphasis of responsibility and accountability to the true union of labourers." People's Delegate Head of the Soldiers' and Miners' of Divesk's Delegated Popular Power Council, Sebastian Azud is quoted saying "Sounds solid". [Followed by French translation]
3	September 27, 2024	RUMOURS IN MSCD ABOUT CRONGRESS Rumours circulating in the Miners' and Soldiers' Council of Divesk of a congress forming in the coming days in order to facilitate a permanent document governing the city as successor to the provisional council. [Followed by French translation] [Photo of map of Divesk]	First mention of congress
4	September 27, 2024	Vote for your MISrepresentative The candidates for the October Elections have been slowly trickling in, though it appears money and power have taken the front seat. Of the 7 districts, and 2 privileged to urbanites, formed by the Republic of Senators, only 6 have found possible candidacies. Only one of which, District 2 (the one with Urbis), has any competition with Cossack War veteran and former lackluster president of the Republic Wanda Ward II of the New Farun Labour and Mr. Portfolio (except for Labour and Agriculture) Maon Vutusti with the Liberal-Conservative Party. Aside from that one district, all the others have either zero candidates or are dominated by Liberal-Conservative Candidates. Hypothetically, even if citizen Ward wins District 2, 6 hole [sic] seats would be going to the Liberal-Conservatives and, under the current constitution, they would require only a simple majority (which 6 seats would grant) to swiftly pass laws of their political desire (without any real drive for compromise). Worst, to amend the constitution the Senate only requires 2/3rds a vote (which 6 would allow) meaning the entirety of the constitution would be up to be hollowed out by a singular party. This paper is not decrying any particular policies of any party but posits the dangers of a singular party government would bring to the Republic. How can there be a will for the People if they have no ability to chose and express such a will. There can be no consent if there is no option of rejection. For readers interested in what a possible government of the Liberal-Conservatives could look like, their party platform is published. Some policies of note include: Expansion of taxes, expansion of extraction operations on the environment, business-first economic approaches, expansion of instruments of repression, and the promotion of division among citizens due to the difference of belief. Is this election the most important in the Republic's history? [Followed by caricature image of an LCP candidate]	The LCP would go on to win 6 seats in the senate
5	September 28, 2024	NEW FREE REAL ESTATE OVER 100 ACRES OF NEW PROPERTY HAS JUST BEEN OPENED IN THE SOUTHERN HALF OF FARU. NOT JUST LANDED PROPERTY, PROPERTY OF ALL KINDS AND MATERIALS. FOUND IN THE FORMER CITY LIBERTY, PROSPECTIVE BUYERS CAN FIND ALMOST ANYTHING, INCLUDING LAND, IN ABUNDANCE AND FOR A CHEAP CHEAP PRICE. [Followed by French translation]	The article was taken down and a noticed issued stating "The Independent Industry News retracts a statement made earlier today based on false rumours in regards to cheap property in the still former Liberty City"
6	September 29, 2024	Divesk Developments The Miners' and Soldiers' Council of Divesk has two major developments occurring today: The first is the reinforcement between the town and Markarth, with a treaty of friendship being signed. In it, Divesk is to supply surplus food to Markarth once a week. This sees a rejuvenation of the old Commodity Brigades the Company Regime had, famously delivering to the former Liberty City. The second development is the start of a Divesk Revolutionary Congress [sic] to start the creation of a permanent document of governance for the town. The congress was declared and currently organized by the current provisional government. The Congress is expected to last 2 more weekends (meta talk, Remuva is only going to be only for 2 hours per weekend). [Followed by French translation] [Photo of Remuva in Divesk]
7	October 9, 2024	Labour Party Gone... AGAIN !!! The New Labour Front was dissolved yesterday following its inability to obtain candidates for the coming elections. The part had led in governments in the past since its softening on radical politics after the fall of the Faru Labour Front. It will not be missed. De_Remuva, head of Divesk, commented "Reformism 0 - Divesk Revolutionaries 2". [Followed by French translation]
8	October 12, 2024	They.... they disappeared ? Everyone ? The congress... it was finalizing and they disappeared... Where in time ??? Maybe they'll re-appear in the far future or far past, maybe in another world... Last transmission from De_Remuva before spontaneous disappearance "I had a realization"	First issue without bold title, last issue on Divesk. Editor following De Remuva is unknown
9	December 16, 2024	COMMUNIQUÉ FROM ST. OLGA INSURGENTS - FMA DISSIDENTS The slow office of the Independent Industry News received not long ago a communiqué from what appears to be FMA dissidents and remnants of the insurgents from the St. Olga episode a week ago. The IIN is publishing the letter in full for transparency. Titled "Why we fight", it reads: "Many in the Capital think the war is over, "Thank God we don't have to hear those peasants anymore!" is a common phrase found among them. Their war, the one in which they had to fight their conscious, is over; our war has just begun. Deep in the countryside and in the rubbles [sic] of old St. Olga, many have asked us "why do you fight?" It is a fair question to ask. I can easily write "We fight for our independence". 1919 was only the independence of the propertied and capital owning class who, after the air of revolution was swept, quickly started their opeartion [sic] of exploitation against the land and the common. Let it not be forgotten that it was the conceited "Protector of the Republic" (more so the Plundered [of the Republic]) which installed a corporate labour colony in the heart of Faru. Then, when the damned of the colony revolted and installed their self-acting body body [sic], it was the presses and those with means that denigrated the toilers. They lost their opportunity to plunder that site as the revolutionaries spontaneously disappeared, but they jumped at the opportunity to pillage St. Olga on the 11th. The soldiers, which some distinguish as "Armymen" and "mercenaries" (they're all mercenaries), attacked, pillaged, plundered, and murdered those in the far east who were awoken to their environment and decide to seize the reigns of their life. A true independence. The exploiter government, since 1919, has hogged itself around against the commons; it has ignored the plight of the tiller and the toiler, from Pen Island to Divesk to the Boxcars and to St. Olga. It has shown itself as such a known issue which the state ignores that foreign governments have planted their own troops mimicking the struggle. We, those struggling who have come together, have been shutted [sic] by the government. We are told to be quiet. We are not desired, we are marked for oblivion. That is why the reason we fight is more than the political slogan of "independence". Not discounting the reasons for independence, nay it is that the root for such is our survival. Those who have come together to struggle, we, are standing up; we are saying "enough". To the government of exploiters, plundered and killers (foreign or domestic), ENOUGH! That is the struggle that truly ignited on the 11th and it is for that reason the members of the Federation of Mutualists and Agrarians which partook in the St. Olga Uprising have come together to continue the struggle. Rebuilding is a priority that is already occuring [sic] as I pen this. Though that it not all, the members have come to the realization that our war against oblivion continues so long the government named "Faru" poaches; it is for that reason that the members have decided to form a means to defend ourselves, a force of self-defense for the dignity of those of the soil. The means in which the voiceless can speak. All of you in the urban cities which cultures the life of the poor peasants need not worry, this organ would not be used for the pointless terrorism against civilians. Nor would it be an organ to overthrow the government and proclaim a "new revolution" to "represent all". We don't represent all. We only represent ourselves, we don't hide ourselves behind those we supposedly represent (who don't realize they are being "represented"). With that, it is announced that those in our struggle have formed the Auxiliary Defensive Army - Armée Défensive Auxiliaire (ADA). It is the combative transmission belt between exploited and the exploiter. It is also announced the formation of Common Autonomous Territories - Territoires Autonomes Communs (CATAC). It is the body we organize our administration under. The war is not over; the war will never be over even if the ADA and CATAC are destroyed by the forces of property. -D. E. Remuva, organizer of the ADA & CATAC. P.s. despite the name, I have no relation to the former Lord Lieutenant of Divesk Remo Remgéglique Rémy de Remuva" What does this mean for those in the east ? Is Remuva not related to de Remuva ? How will the state react ? Posted below are the flags they sent too. [Flags of ADA and CATAC shown]	First issue about ADA
10	December 30, 2024	COMMUNIQUÉ FROM ADA The following video was sent anonymously to the IIN offices. In it depicts a masked ADA member placing stacks of hay in front of various voting stations all over Faru. What does this mean? With the wheat were boxes that had a written document in it. The IIN was able to obtain a copy of it, which can be shared when requested. What does this mean for those in the east? What else are they planning? How will the Republic respond to this protest? [Followed by an edited video of ADA commiting "terrorism"]	First video published by IIN
11	January 8, 2025	COMMUNIQUÉ FROM ADA It’s not everyday the government publishes your name, saying it wants you. I’m flattered. Many women have told me the same thing though no one has attained me yet. The so-called “Honourable” Supreme Court has released a warrant of arrest for me. Let us see what the Horrible Supreme Court has issued. It reads “YOU ARE COMMANDED … to seize and take into custody … D. E. Remuva, who has been charged with a count of treason … [&] terrorism”. I have purposefully cut out segments of the warrant because it was full of the filler genteel words the owners of property and capital love to masterbate with. Firstly, it is interesting that **YOU** are commanded. You have no choice in this, it is a command, an order, a demand from the state itself. If one wanted to be commanded around, they would have joined the military in which they would be commanded to sit and relax on their boats blockading the free city of St. Olga. But, as the notion of a free citizen is a joke in Faru, you too are now a pawn for the government. Secondly, I am charged with treason and terrorism. Frankly it is hilarious. Treason is to betray one’s government or country. I am not a part of the government or the farce that calls itself a country the Republic of Faru. By the time the republic was proclaimed and established, I was in league with the league (of revolutionary shop stewards). What citizenship I had was with Divesk, not the Republic of Faru. I have never been a citizen of this joke of a republic, therefore the charge of treason is false. And then there is terrorism. It is a scary word. Though I ask, what terrorism ? If we refer to the peaceful resistance shown during the night of the election, that is placing harvested blocks of wheat in front of polling stations, as terrorism then I truly fear for the liberties of those shackled to the republic. The Penal Code defines terrorism as a violent crime or “majorly commit a crime against property”. Notwithstanding yet another proof that the republic is that of the class which owns property and capital, no property was damaged. Are we scared of wheat? During the days of the Plunderer Chaton, a little wheat wouldn’t have even raised a hair. The wheat, as told in the communiqué, was open to being taken by civilians to eat. Great poverty strikes many of the common, but truly a peasant in the far east is the greatest concern of the government. I suspect the state knows how much of a joke that charge is, but they believe **YOU** to be an idiot who will shiver from the word terrorism. They will try to draw equivalence between those of the soil fighting for their survival and dignity and those mercenaries playing revolutionaries in the Zerg. These papers seem scary though I hold no fear, as all fighters in the ADA. With a simple mask, I have many faces. From the mountains of the far east, -D. E. Remuva (if that is even my real name), organizer of the ADA & CATAC. P. S. Allow me to play lawyer for the Most Horrible Sophime Court of Fart-u, as those in the CATAC and ADA stand up and say “ENOUGH” to the exploiter government in Urbis, it would be “insurrection” that I should be charged with.	ADA response to Supreme Court arrest warrant
12	January 16, 2025	COMMUNIQUÉ FROM ADA Following a recent letter interview by the new VIZIONAR newspaper, the IIN received a communiqué from ADA for publication. Is this infighting among those on the left, will there be new blood? The Letter: Response to a fellow-traveller Not long ago I was sent a letter by a sympathetic journalist asking a series of questions. I tried to answer them as accurately as possible as spokesperson for the ADA and CATAC. Recently I received a copy of the new paper VIZIONAR, claiming to be the “Faru Organ of the International Proletariat”. Good for them. I think the world needs more papers, especially if they differ from the tabloid yellow journalism found in many published in Faru. I’m flattered this first issue had ADA and the struggle as its first subject. Then I read the article. The majority of the paper were my own words, and I stand by ever letter printed in that section. However, the first four paragraphs were the author’s analysis of the current condition in the struggle as well as that of the broad “left”. I mean no ill against the author or the paper, any self-reflection in “the left” is better than no self-reflection. I don’t know the biography of the author and it does not concern me, however it is apparent the author may be mislead by the struggle on-going in the far east. The first paragraph claims the “Farun socialist tradition” imagines a “communard society”. I ask, which Farun socialist tradition and which “communard society”? Anyone who has lived in the socialist spaces since 1919 will know if there is one thing about the “Farun socialist tradition” and “communard society” is that it does not exist, or at least does not exist singularly. The old and later new labour fronts had varied ideas of this “communard society” would be and one would need to be a fool to forget the projects in Divesk. The author, however, brushes such history, nuance, texture all aside to declare that the current state of “the left” is one of romanticism, reaction, and bourgeois (don’t laugh!). Why do they claim that? As I shall point out later, it is not because of any analysis of the class character or actions undertaken by the revolutionaries (both past and present) but because their flags are different. I do agree with the authors understanding of the constitutional convention. The premise itself was faulty as it relied on concessions to the propertied and capital owning class and their quest to form a republic of their own. Even the now-disappeared Lord Lieutenant de Remuva, part of the Industrialist Faction, partook in the tea party. And I do agree with the mistake of anarchists. It should be made note I, speaking for myself, am not an anarchist nor is ADA or CATAC “anarchist”. Later in the article the author makes the mistake of assuming such but if one reads the interview one would see this “… we do not have a particular dogma. In the struggle there are many with different ideas. I myself am with the covenant ideal expressed in the late Divesk, others are agrarians, mutualists., federationists, peasants seeking a better life”. Frankly it seems that the author has no clue about the events transpired by the ADA and CATAC. They declare there must be a “liberatory vanguard” though no remark as to what that means. Would not the ADA and CATAC be such a “liberators vanguard”? They argued no revolution is inherent or inevitable but apparently it can only have one program. The collective world of the proletariat has as many programs as the world demands. Such programs would drown if adopted through dogma. The third paragraph is the author’s point in regards to the insurgency taking place in the far east. The author makes the error of believing the initial uprising in St. Olga and the insurgency are one and the same. The initial uprising on the 11th of December occurred due to those same democratic socialist segments described before who took an opportunity to seize power in a far off area in the far east for, frankly, egotistical motivations. Some of the revolutionaries in the struggle might disagree with me though I think being open about what occurred is healthy. It was after the Interior Campaign led by the butcher Volchok that those peasants, workers, labourers, all those of the soil who say “ENOUGH” came to St. Olga, along with returning FMAists (except the egotistical ones) to take hold of the opportunity to revolt. The character and form of the on-going revolution and war against oblivion is different from the uprising initiated by the former Farun President. The article claims the revolution doesn’t hold potential. With an attitude like that, I suppose we are to go back home and starve to death. The fact the revolution is holding out and ever-building presents its potential. The author claims the fact of the revolution means the state will use it as an excuse to expand its power to “quell true revolutionary consciousness”. Whatever “true revolutionary consciousness is”, it is such the state would have used that excuse to expand its power too. And to continue on military discussion, the author apparently ignores what I spoke in regards to ADA’s changing military plans. Of course I can not disclose them openly, there’s a war happening. The only reason why there is blame on those starving for the state is because the flag of ADA and CATAC are not to their liking. They ask “where is the giant portrait of Marks on your banner”? And from then on they judge. I have read Marks, I think people should read Marks. Marks did not conduct her analysis on banners. The potential of emancipation with the ADA and CATAC is demonstrated by the actions the ADA and CATAC have done. “Such as?” People will ask. It is true we, those in the struggle, have not done our part to publish our politics; we’re sorry we’ve been busy fighting a war. If there is one thing the ADA and CATAC has been doing, it is having “organizational collective action” but perhaps the author does not recognize this because the ADA isn’t participating in elections. The liberation of the proletariat, phrased by our communiqués as those who represent ourselves (which I apparently must spell it out, means those conscious dispossessed and exploited), is not a utopian ideal or far-flung; that is correct for it is not far at all, it is starting right in the east. The final paragraph presents a damning sense as to how the authors see the world. “The romantic revolutionaries of St. Olga serve no greater purpose but to highlight the need for collective and systemic action”. First, we are only romantic in how we love. Secondly, the authors sees those in the struggle not as people fighting against oblivion, not those, through sweat, blood and tears, give up many things in order to emancipate themselves and their loved ones. No, for the author the “revolutionaries of St. Olga” are abstract, they practically do not exist. An abstract model not taken up for its own actions but to how what it isn’t in order to, using backwards logic, “prove” a “directive” that’s been so vulgarized it has blinded them from the practice in front of them. If my language seemed harsh by the end of this communiqué, I don’t apologize. We are people not robots. As I said I do welcome these words and hope to hear more from VIZIONAR. I would hope that they actually take what their interviewee is saying and what they have said before in consideration of their analysis, or else it will continue to be thin with little value. From the mountains of the far east, -D. E. Remuva, organizer of the ADA & CATAC. P. S. For other fellow travellers, do not calling us “St. Olga rebels”, “St. Olga revolutionaries”, “St. Olga” this or that. It will be outdated anyways.	ADA response following interview conducted with VIZIONAR.
11	February 23, 2025	ADA (Last words for the season) Muhahaha le revolution iz le forever. We also had ze minister of army in our pockets muahahah. And muahhaa I, D. E. Remuva, iz actually related to De Remuva muahahah	Season 4 of Infaru ended that day.